BLOOM’S TAXONOMY MAPPING: This module addresses multiple levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy, progressing from foundational knowledge of stress and emotional regulation mechanisms, through skilled application during professional practice, to competence in designing personal resilience plans.
● Identify the three-phase burnout model (alarm–resistance–exhaustion) and its clinical significance.
● Define resilience as adaptive recovery capacity and explain how it differs from endurance or resistance.
● Explain the neurophysiological basis of key emotional regulation strategies: controlled breathing, emotional labeling, and cognitive reframing.
● Recognise early warning signs of emotional overload across physical, cognitive, emotional, and behavioural domains.
● Apply at least two evidence-informed emotional regulation techniques during acute stress situations.
● Map personal early warning signs of overload using a structured stress signature worksheet.
● Formulate and practise one assertive boundary statement applicable to the participant’s professional role.
● Analyse a clinical case scenario to identify burnout phase, structural contributors, and appropriate intervention level.
● Evaluate personal and structural contributors to burnout risk and distinguish between individual-level and system-level intervention requirements.
● Design a personalised, realistic 7-day micro self-care plan integrating emotional regulation techniques, boundary commitments, and recovery practices adapted to role and schedule.
● The following learning outcomes follow the ABCD model (Audience, Behaviour, Condition, Degree) and the SMART criteria (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) to ensure clarity and consistent alignment with assessment requirements.
● KNOWLEDGE LEARNING OUTCOME: Healthcare professionals (A) will be able to define and differentiate between the concepts of resilience, emotional regulation, burnout, and compassion fatigue (B) using evidence-based definitions and healthcare-related case examples (C).
● Assessment Method: Multiple-choice and short-answer assessment covering key concepts, burnout stages, and resilience frameworks. Passing threshold: 50% of the total score.
● KNOWLEDGE LEARNING OUTCOME: Healthcare professionals (A) will be able to explain the neurophysiological mechanisms underlying key emotional regulation strategies such as controlled breathing, emotional labeling, and cognitive reframing (B) and describe their relevance for stress management in daily professional practice (C).
● Assessment Method: Written knowledge assessment using multiple-choice questions and short application exercises. Evaluation is based on the correct identification of strategies and their mechanisms of action.
● SKILLS LEARNING OUTCOME: Healthcare professionals (A) will demonstrate the ability to apply at least two evidence-based emotional regulation techniques (B) to reduce acute stress reactions in workplace situations (C).
● Assessment Method: Performance-based assessment during pilot sessions through the demonstration of breathing techniques, emotional labeling, or cognitive reframing using standardized scenarios. Evaluation through an observation checklist.
● SKILLS LEARNING OUTCOME: Healthcare professionals (A) will be able to identify and document personal early warning signs of emotional overload (B) by analysing and reflecting on their individual stress signature (C).
● Assessment Method: Portfolio assessment based on the completed stress-signature worksheet, a written reflection, and participation in a facilitated group discussion.
● COMPETENCE LEARNING OUTCOME: Healthcare professionals (A) will be able to design and justify a personalised 7-day micro self-care plan (B) that integrates emotional regulation techniques, recovery strategies, and boundary-setting practices (C).
● Assessment Method: Assessment of the self-care portfolio using a rubric that evaluates feasibility, completeness, relevance to the participant’s work context, and integration of evidence-based strategies.
● COMPETENCE LEARNING OUTCOME: Healthcare professionals (A) will be able to analyse workplace stress scenarios and distinguish between individual and structural contributors to burnout risk (B) in order to propose appropriate prevention and intervention measures (C).
● Assessment Method: Case-study analysis based on the “Maria” scenario. Evaluation is conducted using a rubric assessing analytical depth, identification of risk factors, and the quality and practicality of proposed interventions.
|
Term |
Definition |
|
Resilience |
Resilience is the ability to adapt, recover, and maintain well-being when facing stress, adversity, or challenging situations. It is a dynamic capacity that can be strengthened through practice, supportive relationships, and healthy coping strategies. |
|
Emotional Regulation |
Emotional regulation refers to the ability to recognize, manage, and respond to emotions in a constructive way. It helps individuals maintain emotional balance and act effectively, particularly in stressful or demanding situations. |
|
Emotional Labeling |
Emotional labeling is the process of identifying and naming one’s emotions (e.g., “I feel frustrated” or “I feel overwhelmed”). Recognizing emotions in this way can reduce emotional intensity and improve self-awareness and self-control. |
|
Cognitive Reframing |
Cognitive reframing is a technique that involves viewing a situation from a different perspective in order to reduce stress and develop more balanced and constructive interpretations of events. |
|
Micro- Recovery |
Micro-recovery refers to short, intentional moments of rest and recovery integrated into the workday, such as a brief breathing exercise, a short walk, or a mindful pause. These small breaks help reduce accumulated stress and restore energy. |
|
Compassion Fatigue |
Compassion fatigue is a state of emotional and physical exhaustion resulting from prolonged exposure to the suffering of others. It can reduce empathy, increase emotional withdrawal, and affect both professional performance and personal well-being. |
|
Psychological Safety |
Psychological safety is a shared belief that team members can speak up, ask questions, admit mistakes, and express concerns without fear of blame, embarrassment, or negative consequences.
|
Module 2 focuses on strengthening personal resilience and supporting participants in developing effective emotional regulation strategies within demanding professional environments. The module addresses the impact of stress, emotional overload, and workplace pressure, particularly in health-related professions where continuous interaction with clients, patients, and colleagues can contribute to increased mental strain.
Participants are introduced to practical techniques for recognizing stress triggers, managing emotional responses, and maintaining psychological well-being in everyday work situations. Through self-reflection activities, scenario-based learning, and applied coping strategies, the module encourages participants to build healthy routines, improve self-awareness, and strengthen their ability to respond constructively to challenging situations.
The overall aim of the module is to support long-term mental resilience, promote emotional balance, and contribute to the prevention of stress-related exhaustion and burnout in professional practice.
